Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiri Borkovec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kevin (talk) 07:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Jiri Borkovec

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does he meet relevant notability standards? Not clear. Rd232 talk 11:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Article was written by a non-English speaker not used to WP style. However the subject's notability is claimed and a source is cited, or at least mentioned. No reason to delete the article unless something else comes up. The article is also tagged for conflict of interest, seemingly because the author is also involved in the same sport and lives in the same nation. If so no American who plays golf should be allowed to contribute to Tiger Woods's article.Northwestgnome (talk) 12:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * That argument is a bit disingenuous. The conflict of interest tag is almost certainly for the far more obvious reason that the article is about one Jiri Borkovec and its creator is one . Uncle G (talk) 13:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I missed that. Maybe delete then is the best thing until someone can translate the articles in the Chech body-building magazine which are said to establish his notability.Northwestgnome (talk) 01:53, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello! Im Ivan Mach, the author of the article. Jiri gave me all rights to do all his promotion. Im using Borkovecjiri nickname because Jiri wanted me to use it. About the Czech Magazine...You can find all his media exposure at the photo gallery at his official website. If there is anything that I can explain dont hesistate to ask me me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borkovecjiri (talk • contribs) 05:14, October 11, 2009
 * Delete. I'm sorry, Northwestgnome, but there is a way too obvious conflict of interest. And sources need to be cited, not only mentioned, that is what Wikipedia is all about. And article needs to be written much better. WildHorsesPulled (talk) 23:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious COI and prose concerns, questionable notability as per WP:ATHLETE, no Google News hits, no quality sources found from a brief search. Glass  Cobra  15:46, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.