Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JitBug


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 01:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

JitBug

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotion of non notable, new app. No evidence of notability in search. Speedy declined. –Ammarpad (talk) 15:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. WeAreAll Here  talk  15:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, though whilst not new (this news post is from end of 2015), it doesn't seem to have had any media reporting about it or any discussions to make it notable in any way. You could argue WP:TOOSOON if it had just been released, though over 2 years and still nothing of any note? I think it is just promotional and not really in need of an article. Bungle (talk • contribs) 22:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Adabow (talk) 23:42, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 09:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:SOFTWARE. The app is simply not notable and nothing exists to assert how the app is significant enough to include in an encyclopedia. The only coverage of the subject I found is an article from 2015 which mentions 80 teachers using the app; this news article is also not viable as a source as it consist to a large degree of interviews with teachers. The path to deletion is open wide.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.