Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jithin Majeed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Jithin Majeed

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

May not be notable, and created by an individual abusing multiple accounts as confirmed by Commons Checkuser at the Undeletion requests on Commons (Please see: c:Special:PermaLink/437201316) Ìch heiss Nat.  Redd mìt mìr .🥨 02:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Ìch heiss Nat.  Redd mìt mìr .🥨 02:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Please note that a draft (Draft:Jithin Majeed) was rejected multiple times and the article was created to circumvent the AFC process. who reviewed and rejected the draft submissions. -- Ìch heiss Nat.  Redd mìt mìr .🥨 02:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, appears to be notable for a single event - winning a regional student award (non-notable award) for a short documentary (questionable notability) - and then not being able to attend the award ceremony. Fails to satisfy the criteria under WP:NCREATIVE. Dan arndt (talk) 04:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable for one of the highest honours in television production in the world, i.e. RTS Award (Regional or otherwise), refer Producers_Alliance_for_Cinema_and_Television guidlines. Lifted from WP:NCREATIVE, The person's work (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition (RTS Awards 2020), (c) won significant critical attention (RTS Craftskills award for camerawork & ongoing media attention in South India) which should satify WP:NCREATIVE. (paintitkid) 08:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC) Striking sockpuppet comment. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: This individual was also instrumentalal in propelling Operation_Sulaimani, refer The Hindu. (paintitkid) 09:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC) Striking sockpuppet comment. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) That The Hindu link does not reference Operation Sulaimani, let alone describe Majeed as "instrumental" thereto and 2) The Operation Sulaimani article, whose editors are disinterested third-parties with respect to Majeed (unlike the article under discussion, whose sole substantive editors are you and your sock), does not reference Majeed (!!!). Quite the glaring omission for someone purportedly "instrumental."  Эlcobbola  talk 14:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per Dan arndt. No demonstration that subject has "gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time" per WP:N.  Эlcobbola  talk 14:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, I mentioned The individual's involvement in Operation Sulaimani as a side note, nonetheless it is important. The Hindu specifically refers to it at the very end of the article if you see, the style of writing is very much Malabar Coast English, which might be the reason the significance did not translate. It is typical of The Hindu. Nonetheless, this does not invalidate the crux of the article or the individuals claim to notability in cinematography (!!!). The Individual has and is continuing to appear on syndicated news networks and daily offline material (such as Madhyamam) every month for the last year (please refer sources online) - MediaOne - MediaScan, Indian Express which satisfies the 'notabaility over a period of time' criteria. The case of the sock was an honest mistake, I have had the filmassoc account in the past, but did not realise I was using that account instead of this one. As my browser logs in to a default account when accessing Wikipedia, it sometimes gets mixed up between the accounts (Login detail are saved); which I did not realise. Will be careful moving forward. (paintitkid) 16:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC) Striking sockpuppet comment. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE or WP:BASIC. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" or "note"—that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded"". Some WP:ROUTINE coverage exists. Might just be WP:TOOSOON.  // Timothy ::  talk  17:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.