Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jive Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Jive Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As per WP:CORP this article doesn't have any extensive coverage about it by third party reliable sources.All the references cited therein are mere passing mentions as shown in the first reference here,the second reference here is a piece of coverage by prnews which is not a reliable source and in fact it is just an announcement. The third reference is from Forbes which is a reliable source but the context in which Jive is mentioned is just as a passing mention in article about something else altogether. And another reference from a PR oriented website. Other cited reference 1,2, and 3 are from a review websites about VoIP service providers which doesn't meet the threshold to be a reliable source as per WP:RS since anyone can write a review including persons having a conflict of interest in the subject.On these counts I think the article should be deleted as it contravenes WP:Notability organizations_and_companies Kansiime (talk) 09:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Kansiime (talk) 13:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Kansiime (talk) 13:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now at best as there's some coverage but perhaps nothing to suggest a solid enough notable article for the applicable guidelines. SwisterTwister   talk  06:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC) Pinging for comments after it was relisted. Dat GuyTalkContribs 12:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - The subject fails WP:GNG as per the sources available as of now. Some of the sources are actually about non- notable individuals who have been hired by the organization in question and press releases that are generally non-reliable sources according to WP:RS. Mwenzangu (talk) 09:11, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. All those references, and not a single substantial treatment by a reliable source among them. The article is also painfully promotional. Thparkth (talk) 03:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.