Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jlin (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that there is sufficient coverage to establish notability. Davewild (talk) 07:22, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Jlin (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no indication of notability. fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC John from Idegon (talk) 16:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails notability criteria. Should removed under WP:A7. Tymon. r   Do you have any questions?  17:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC through non-trivial, independent coverage in reliable sources, some of which are already contained in the article. In addition, it has been written that "footwork might have just found its new pioneer", which indicates that the subject of the article may also meet NMUSIC #7. — sparklism hey! 17:04, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - Subject has been covered in independent sources, but very trivially. This this were the only sources I could find that provided non-trivial coverage, and I don't think this is enough to prove that this person is notable. Pishcal  — ♣ 17:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — sparklism  hey! 17:46, 5 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Coverage is easily adequate enough to satisfy the GNG and WP:NMUSIC. --Michig (talk) 06:01, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 6 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. The above Pitchfork, Fact, and Vice articles are reliable, independent sources dedicated to the subject and sufficient significant coverage for the general notability guideline. – czar   02:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Czar. Coverage at sites such as these demonstrate that the subject meets WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC.  Gongshow   talk  21:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.