Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jnatrdharmakathah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 05:19, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Jnatrdharmakathah

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article doesn't cite any sources, has been abandoned for a long time, parts of it don't make sense, it has a lot of errors, and it is not needed on Wikipedia. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 22:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. I'm concerned about the lack of sourcing, but from what I can follow of the article it's about a notable text in a notable religion. Pending confirmation either way from an editor with more expertise in this area, I'd be amazed if sources don't exist. "Not making sense" and "having a lot of errors" are reasons to improve, rather than delete, the average article. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources provided. The rest of my rationale above stands. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Mind the spelling. Google yields several scholarly references. 84.73.134.206 (talk) 08:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be a notable concept in Jainism going by 84.73.134.206's search. The argument for deletion isn't valid and is one of a number of problematic nominations made by this user recently. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 14:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above; problematic nomination and reasons (stated above) to keep. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 02:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.