Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/João Dorminsky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Even considering leniency for non-standard musical market, the sourcing does not appear to meet WP:RS, does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. Consensus is to delete (✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:38, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

João Dorminsky

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN BLP fails WP:MUSICBIO. (Makes claim of notability or else I would WP:A7.) czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:59, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Greetings Czar, what's your exact reason for this articles deletion? What information do you need? Best regards. — Upir3 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 09:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC) (UTC).
 * Hi—the article should pass WP:MUSICBIO's notability guidelines to be included in the encyclopedia czar   &middot;   &middot;  09:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Hi Czar, I believe at least one of the mandatory criterias is covered. There are also scans of offline media coverage from main portuguese newspapers and magazines sources, tv appearances, record reviews, interviews, etc. Since this was an introduction and Pi's main work has at least 8 years, I was hoping to have more time to update it with media that I collected but haven't yet processed. Is there something specific you think should be featured to remove the deletion flag? Best!Upir3 (talk) 09:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC) — Upir3 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The notability guidelines are listed at WP:MUSICBIO. Mainly, it needs independent, reliable sources (WP:N). From a search, I couldn't find anything, but if you have significant Portuguese media coverage (not just cursory/peripheral mentions), that could help. It also may be that this artist just isn't notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia yet. We have to go off of the info available now—the article can always be re-created if he becomes more notable in the future. czar   &middot;   &middot;  18:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:58, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:58, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:58, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:04, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete cannot see it meeting any criterion of WP:MUSICBIO. LibStar (talk) 02:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.