Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jožef Kerec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   userfy to User:Stebunik/Jožef Kerec. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Jožef Kerec

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I believe the biography is non-notable. A CSD was rejected. There is no reliable source to show that Jožef Kerec was an apostolic vicar. I have not found any sources that show notability on any other standard. Request AfD delete.   ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪    ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  07:35, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with nom. There's no indication of notability in that. I realize Graeme will probably assert something after the fact, I don't see the requite requirement on the original terms. Shadowjams (talk) 08:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: a 430 page biography on him was published in Ljubljana in 1992; see http://www.bukvarna.net/component/option,com_ezcatalog/task,viewcategory/id,97/Itemid,2/ which Google can translate from Slovenian - it also mentions a paper to a symposium. However, this article is not worth saving in its current form. A Slovenian article might usefully be written first. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:56, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Stubify in the hope that some one cares to write a substantive article based on the Slovenian book. Since unregistered users can edit but not create articles, this gives them a chance.  Peterkingiron (talk) 20:49, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for now, as there seem to be no English sources. Recreate when a Slovenian article gets written. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 23:03, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I declined the speedy delete as this sounded to be an unusual person. It already is a stub, so I don't think it can be stubbed down any more. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:32, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that "this sounded to be an unusual person" is a strong reason to keep the article. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 08:58, 8 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment The closing admin/editor should take into account the following two discussion threads before closing the discussions here:
 * User talk:Stebunik
 * User talk:Wifione
 * I also think the user wishes to have the biography userfied. Thanks and regards.   ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪    ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  10:55, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't see how this person is notable or how this article is beneficial to wikipedia.. there are not even any sources. It should be deleted unless vast improvements and drastic changes are done to the article. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:36, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.