Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JoMei Chang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete both. No evidence provided that Ms. Chang or her company are notable. lifebaka++ 19:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

JoMei Chang

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Neither this person nor the company she founded (listed below) seems notable to me. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 17:08, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Keep theres coverage of her in major publicationsThisbites (talk) 19:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 02:16, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I am also proposing Vitria Technology (her company) for deletion.
 * Merge JoMei Chang to Vitria Technology. Keep Vitria Technology.  She is mentioned in some notable magazines, and made a top entreprenueurs (or something like that) list for one of them in 2001.  Vitria is also traded on the NASDAQ, and per WP:LISTED while that this fact alone does not signify notablility, it is something to consider.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 17:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:27, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Delete. She has a few lines of favorable coverage in a reputable business magazine, and has been quoted occasionally in reputable publications. That is not notability. I thought about how to rewrite it, but there is too much unsourced material, excessive detail, and self-flattery. Perchloric (talk) 02:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Strong Delete: This is a resume disguised as an article about a person not yet sufficiently notable to merit her own page. (That's the kindest way I can put it.) Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 03:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.