Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jo Gibb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Salvio 09:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Jo Gibb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actress; article is currently unsourced with no evidence of reliable sources existing. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:37, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: Non-notable theatre actress. Article has been an unsourced stub for the entire thirteen years of its existence. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  01:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Gibb is a theatre actress whose roles are not covered by IMDb, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Edited vote. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  20:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - As the nominator for PROD. Even though most of her work is for theatre, and IMDb isn’t a great indicator for that, it’s clear that her theatre career has not generated sufficient substantial coverage to meet WP:GNG Cardiffbear88 (talk) 08:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: I've added a number of references and a few more roles; she's received a number of good reviews for her mostly leading roles Piecesofuk (talk) 10:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The citations that are accessible mention subject only in passing, and include primary sources (thisistheatre; a cast listing; and the EvStandard article merely a show announcement) and one permanent dead link. Not enough to establish notability. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  20:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I reviewed the sources. It is inaccurate to say that the reviews that talk about Gibb's performance and include a quote from her mention her only in passing. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 21:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep as meets WP:NACTOR #1 for various theatre roles. I checked out some of the sources listed by another editor and found some of my own. There is this significant coverage in the article and more. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 22:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as the article has been significantly improved since its nomination when it was unreferenced with the addition of multiple reliable sources references that confirm that Gibb has had a number of leading roles in notable theatre productions and therefore passes WP:NACTOR and deserves to be included, in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, The article has been improved, Alex-h (talk) 08:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: I looked at some of the sources that have been added, and Gibb is often singled out as the lead actress in a play, even when no other actors are mentioned. — Toughpigs (talk) 19:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable actress who has had several significant roles in West End productions. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Multiple leads in multiple West End musicals. Softlavender (talk) 11:45, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. As an actor, she's had significant roles in high-profile musicals and the linked sources seem to be on the up and up. EverybodyEdits (talk) 22:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NACTOR - multiple leads in film and stage. Bearian (talk) 21:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.