Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jo Lamble


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Jo Lamble

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Marked for notability concerns 5 years ago. Fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR. Coverage is mainly of her commenting as a psychologist in the media. Rather than WP:SIGCOV of her as the subject. LibStar (talk) 03:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 07:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment. Subject also seems to run a question and answer column in Australian newspapers "Clinical psychologist Jo Lamble answers your questions". Not finding any actual coverage right now, but there's a lot to wade through. &mdash;siro&chi;o 05:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - being quoted in the media as a subject matter expert is not the same as coverage about the individual that would indicate notability. Not seeing any evidence online that she meets WP:GNG or any other relevant guideline (such as WP:NACADEMIC). —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.