Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joah Santos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted per CSD G11 RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Joah Santos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Terrible BLP article written like an advertising skit. Fails WP:BIO. Possible professor of advertising but with no verifiable source to confirm. Fails WP:GNG. If keep would need drastic copyedit. scope_creep (talk) 02:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Delete. I can't see what he is notable for. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete as overly spammy: "...A pioneer in early 2000s of Mission Marketing Strategy..." -- ? The subject seems otherwise unremarkable. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G11. Purely promotional. I could not get through enough of it to gain any clue about whether the subject might have some actual notability, but I doubt it. Regardless, this is an ad, not an encyclopedia article. Blow it up. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Indeed, per the nominator, K.E. and David, it's so bad I daresay G11 applies here, as well. I've tagged it as such. Speedy delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.