Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JoakimInterFest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The other article has more or less the same content, one may consider a nomination as well. Tone 17:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

JoakimInterFest

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The lack of reliable third-party sources establishing notability is telling. That the author admits to doing marketing for the event is no surprise: note the second sentence, which treats Wikipedia as if it will be lasting less than a year. Similar problems also plague Joakimfest, though I suppose that has marginal notability. In any case, delete as advertising. Biruitorul Talk 18:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Once again, the question of whether Wikipedia's attractiveness as a publicity outlet should spur us to let it become a publicity outlet. I wonder. Ventifax (talk) 18:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The only way this event can hope for some actual notoriety is if wikipedia allows it to linger on. I wish the festival organizers all the luck, but come back when this even has proved itself mentionable in the outside world, and in reliable sources. I for one think the pictures need to go too, commons or no commons, as I doubt the equivalent articles using them can justify notoriety. Dahn (talk) 19:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Dahn. twirligigLeave one! &#8900; Check me out! 20:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Twirligig --128.54.193.47 (talk) 21:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.