Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Boice, et al v. Emeritus Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Emeritus Senior Living. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Joan Boice, et al v. Emeritus Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable trial level case. See discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law. GregJackP  Boomer!   15:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Perhaps we could use some guidelines on what constitutes a notable case, but whatever those guidelines might be, this would not be such a case. bd2412  T 16:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge This information currently belongs as a section in Emeritus Senior Living as is, not its own article. Int21h (talk) 01:26, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Int21h. I already merged a sentence and reference about this case to the article Emeritus Senior Living. The case is not notable enough for a freestanding article. --MelanieN (talk) 23:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge most of the non-transferred information in to the Emeritus article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 08:56, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:50, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 05:30, 17 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.