Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Cwaik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. ✗ plicit  00:37, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Joan Cwaik

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Promotional BLP- reads like a Linkedin CV rather than an encyclopedia article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)


 * MrsSnoozyTurtle is 100% agree, this person only use Wikipedia for personal promotion. Even in Argentina, where this article could have some interest, isn't important at all (I'm from Argentina). Neither Joan's book where of interest. 181.168.21.254 (talk) 19:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination withdrawn. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:49, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Argentina. — hako9 (talk) 10:19, 10 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep: This is a relevant person in Argentina. The article has been reviewed and approved, so it means that it was considered Relevant for a reviewer too (User:ProgrammingGeek) and it has been on Wikipedia since 2018 and has a couple edits by other contributors, so it is clear that there is consensus about the importance of this article. Let me ask this question: what's the point for collaborators on inverting time on reviewing and approving drafts if one day will appear a user and ask for deleting it? I believe it is disrespectful for the people who spend time on reviewing and approving a draft to pretend to delete an article. May the user who wants this has an interest on this deletion because firstly she tried a speed deletion which was reverted by an administrator. Now, defying the decision of and administrator (User:Cyrius) she started this discussion. — User:SuperFurryBoy — Preceding undated comment added 15:04, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:06, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I am concerned that the article's creator is WP:CANVASSING here: . Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:28, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article creator notifying the original page reviewer is consistent with WP:AFDLIST. The original notification was not ideal, however for clarity: the article creator has since amended to a more appropriate notification here: ResonantDistortion 23:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep, on ther basis the existing coverage cited in the article is enough to convince me Cwaik passes WP:GNG. Though, as the nominator points out, the article is becoming a rambling CV and needs monitoring/cleaning up at the very least. Sionk (talk) 16:06, 17 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.