Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanna Dolgoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. causa sui (talk) 17:02, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Joanna Dolgoff

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a puffy resume for a non-notable person--not notable by our standards. Drmies (talk) 02:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I think she probably is notable as an author, but the article is so highly promotional that it would be best to start over. I also wonder about copyvio, as for any such smoothly written promotional article that does not clearly follow our usual style.  DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Usually that's a giveaway, yes. Drmies (talk) 14:19, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 13:49, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak delete She and her book have gotten some coverage, but only one of the media references listed is actually ABOUT her (Chicago Tribune); the others are merely quoting her in articles about something else. Google Scholar finds no scholarly articles, so WP:ACADEMIC doesn't apply; her popular writing consists of one book and some Huffington Post columns. All in all she fails WP:GNG since I am not finding significant coverage about her in multiple reliable sources. --MelanieN (talk) 23:37, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Vanity page. --Seduisant (talk) 01:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.