Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanne Aono


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈  01:10, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Joanne Aono

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a place to post your resume. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  00:20, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  00:20, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  00:20, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment I was curious why the article was listed as an autobiography. I couldn't tell why by looking at the editors who worked on the article. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 04:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't see a conflict of interest either. I did a brief search and don't see any problem connections between the creator and the subject, and the article creator was the only major editor before the tags were added. Maybe  or the nominator can shed some light. --Closeapple (talk) 06:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm going to remove the COI tag since no one has responded about the issue. Thanks, . Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Promotional and subject fails Creative and GNG. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Have expanded somewhat. Appears to easily meet the GNG. -- Visviva (talk) 20:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The article may have started out promotional, but the editing done has improved it. Thank you, for expanding. I agree that the article passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Significant coverage in reliable sources such as Hyperallergic and the Northwest Indiana Times convince me that the subject meets WP:GNG. gobonobo  + c 02:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per gobonobo . Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:19, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.