Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joaquim Custódia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  18:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Joaquim Custódia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non notable actor, article inappropriately using only IMDB as a source. Research shows that some of the article’s credits weren’t even credited roles, and most were minor appearances. No evidence of substantial secondary sources that could help improve article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete while the just over 2 years survival with this non-exitent of sourcing has nothing on the 14 or more years survival I have seen recently with some other articles with such atrotious sourcing, we should still not allow it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability in article or in searches. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.