Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Job al-Shamie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. Reference has been added and tagged and unsourced claims have been removed. (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot  drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 21:39, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Job al-Shamie

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I'm having trouble finding non-wp-mirror references in RSs to this place. Others are welcome to try; I certainly would not want to delete mention of it if it exists. But if there is no evidence that it exists (let alone that the claims in the article are accurate), it should be deleted IMHO. Presently, the article has zero refs. Epeefleche (talk) 08:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - not surprising, it's uninhabited. Have inserted co-ordinates and ext links to map and photo. Since places are notable this should in fact be enough. Most refs are of course in Arabic. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your typical good work. Have you uncovered perhaps RS refs that would satisfy Verifiability?  For any of the claims in the article, including that it exists?  No refs appear as of yet either on this page or in the article itself, in any language.  Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * :-) Thanks... I think we need an arabic speaker to help us out on this one. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:28, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep This census data from 2004 (in Arabic) appears to be from a reliable source, namely, from their Central Bureau Of Statistics. Job-al Shamie is the ninth village from the bottom of that first link.  I, Jethrobot  drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 20:44, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Good work by Jethrobot, as usual.  I withdraw my nomination, based on the ref Jeth turned up.  Someone may wish to add the ref to the article, and delete the non-supported material (some of which appears to be contradicted by the ref), but my withdrawal is not contingent on either of those.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:52, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.