Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Job for a Cowboy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Bobet 19:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Job for a Cowboy
Appears to fail to meet every single one of the WP:BAND criteria, even though they come close to fulfilling several. Delete for now, may restore later when they actually meet at least one. --Nlu (talk) 18:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Kill it now before it has a chance to spread I vote delete per the fact that it is completely unwiki. !paradigm! 19:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)!paradigm!
 * Delete per nom. Nish kid  64  19:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nom's right, this band does not currently satisfy WP:BAND.-- danntm T C 00:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - If these guys don't merit a decent w/u on allmusic.com, then they probably don't belong here either. Caknuck 06:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:MUSIC. The band is signed to one of the biggest metal labels; Metal Blade Records and seems to have toured through US from June 10 to July 22, and UK from August 1-13 . This is a highly well-known mainstream metalcore band. Even their Wikipedia page gets over 50 edits per month. Don't be an ostrich, use Google. Prolog 07:01, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Only the UK tour was verified, and the US tour was "with" a bundle of other bands. I don't think this is sufficient.  --Nlu (talk) 07:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Either way, it does fill at least one of the criteria of WP:MUSIC. I don't think this Afd really surves any purpose as the band, judging from the talk page and Last.fm, is clearly popular among some and will probably have its article re-created within a few weeks. The re-creation will then re-ignite the genre debate. Prolog 16:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep per Prolog. --badlydrawnjeff talk 10:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't quite yet meet the notability reqirements of WP:BAND, and article provides no third-party sources as specifically required by WP:V. -- Satori Son 14:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Danteferno 19:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.