Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jobos Beach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Technically "wrong venue" as copyright issues are discussed at WP:CP but it seems like the copyright issue was resolved here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:57, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Jobos Beach

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

queried copyvio, for Jobos Beach or Playa Jobos Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Gonzvaldo said "Note from creator: The other page copy the info from my wikipedia page! Wich I am happy about it. You can see in the text that there are has mixed words (without space in between) because they copy and paste my words. I'm a local at that beach, those words about cleaning the beach are mine. My first "Jobos Beach" Wikipedia page was created on 2011, same time as the "Pozo de Jacinto" page, but it was deleted. 2 of the 3 pictures he has at the end of his page were taken by my phone. I don't mind him using my text, but don't delete my Wikipedia page. I just rephrase my wikipedia page to avoid deleting it. Jobos Beach or Playa Jobos is a beach facing the Atlantic Ocean located on the PR-466 street of Isabela in the northwest of Puerto Rico." :: see Template:Backwards copy. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * We had the content first, at Playa de Jobos as of March 22, 2013, at 02:56. The purported source webpage is dated April 24, 2013. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, what's the next step? Will it be deleted? I already edited the contents. I have a few pages that refer to this article, if deleted then I have to replace the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonzvaldo (talk • contribs) 18:44, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment this whole thing is strange. Not sure why this went to AfD when there was a speedy-copyvio tag up. The beach itself should be notable enough for a stand-alone article. I've added one source. The difficulty is it's a tourist hot spot, so most of the immediate search engine hits are tourism-related as opposed to sources helpful for creating an encyclopaedia article. SportingFlyer  T · C  02:22, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. The initial infractions all seem to have been corrected. I don't believe the issue here was ever WP:N; the beach meets that criteria. WP:DBN may also apply here somewhat. Mercy11 (talk) 00:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep.The beach is notable enough for a stand-alone article.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 22:59, 12 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.