Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jobtac


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deleted by KnightLago (CSD A7). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Jobtac

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Advert for recently created recruitment system. Written by user:Jobtac. -- Sgroupace (talk) 22:54, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - since being tagged, the article has been rewritten in a less promotional style, but there is a clear COI and no evidence that the subject is notable - which is anyway unlikely as it was only launched this month. Wikipedia is not here to promote new businesses. JohnCD (talk) 15:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note that COI and POV are not reasons for deletion in themselves; an article written with a clear COI but which meets notability guidelines would be rewritten and de-POVed, rather than exterminated! haz (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed; but COI is worth commenting on, as it causes one to look more critically at the evidence for notability. JohnCD (talk) 19:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. There ought to be a rule that a business has to last two or three months before it has a shot at being notable. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - neither evidence nor assertion of notability. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, as failing WP:ORG. (Although Orangemike's tagged for SD anyway, so adding this comment may prove to have been an exercise in futility...) haz (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I tagged it, but did not delete it, in an effort to respect consensus. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.