Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jocelynne Scutt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep Non admin closure :: maelgwn - talk 07:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Jocelynne Scutt

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced, orphan, "unwikified" and substantially autobiographical article. I would say this needs either aggressive and expeditious cleanup, or removal until a properly independent and sourced article comes along. Cruftbane 21:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:BIO and WP:N. STORMTRACKER   94  11:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up. Dr Scutt is a well-known feminist academic in Australia and has also served as Tasmanian anti-discrimination commissioner. . She also has a number of scholarly works. and books to her credit..
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   —Capitalistroadster 03:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Capital. Twenty Years 13:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Sigh....Keep. Not a well thought out nomination. Tag for cleanup, references etc... but a small effort on Google scholar, google news or anywhere else shows she clearly has sufficient independant commentary to pass WP:BIO - Peripitus (Talk) 21:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable person, but a very poor article.--Grahamec 04:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup desperately needed - not afd - notability assured - bibliography/works section needs broom or brush SatuSuro 05:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup desperately needed - not afd - notability assured - bibliography/works section needs broom or brush SatuSuro 05:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.