Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jock Brocas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  04:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Jock Brocas

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable enough. jj137 ( Talk ) 23:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Very weak delete at this stage as it's unsourced - however, since this was AfD'd 2 minutes after it was created, with the author clearly still working on it, change to keep if sources are added. —  iride  scent  23:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep if adequately sourced. This article is only 30 minutes old and certainly not a CSD candidate. --Blanchardb 23:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Based on a gut feeling I see no notability here, but if the article develops, contact me and I'll support a keep. --Kevin Murray 23:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, only claim to notability is a couple books that aren't published yet. Edward321 02:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO. Doctorfluffy 17:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, author's books haven't even come out yet, it's interesting that there are so many people who have reviewed it. I have removed all of the reviews, which are clearly copyvios, and the book cover, which is a fair use violation.  I can't figure out what O Books is, their website doesn't explain if they're self-publishers or not, and there are too many false Google hits.  Corvus cornix 22:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, could not find significant media coverage. Book not yet released. Saw no evidence of meeting WP:BIO Cheers, :) Dloh cierekim  00:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No find significant media coverage. Epbr123 15:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.