Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jock Hudson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Obvious spam, self-written vanity page. Totally unsourced, and, despite, the comment I'm not convince that he meets the notability guidelines for porn actors, but A7 not needed anyway Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Jock Hudson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A vanity article on an adult film performer. No sourcing to back up his claims of notability, as per WP:BIO or WP:GNG. And Adoil Descended (talk) 17:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Also is an autobiography, appears primarily intended as self-promotion. Does not qualify for A7 though. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 20:10, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 20:10, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.