Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jock James


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Abundant Life Church. Please note, I am not merging any content. If anyone is interested and needs to access the history of the original Jock James article, please ask on my talkpage or click here and then click history. Cheers. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  02:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Jock James

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There has been some discussion about sources and this article coming here. The issue is he's probably well known locally but doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC Travellingcari (talk) 21:25, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 
 * No vote from creator. I suspect that eventually there will be enough references to make him notable, but I agree that right now it's a bit borderline. I will see how this AfD goes; if the article gets deleted, I will recreate it only when James unequivocally meets WP:BIO. --3M163//Complete Geek 21:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SorryGuy  Talk  02:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge/Redirect to Abundant Life Church or Rock Productions Music. Not quite notable enough for his own article. Jfire (talk) 06:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  15:11, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  15:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: I don't think he is notable enough. I support redirect / merger into Abundant Life Church. One of the reasons for delete is the fact that the article doesn't even have any references (except for an interview mentioned on the talk page). Vice regent 18:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll also change my vote should the article imrpove dramatically during the course of this AfD.Vice regent 23:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.