Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jock sniffing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. TravellingCari 03:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Jock sniffing

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Only WP:RS is a book on sexuality. Which is fine, if the rest of the article didn't suffer from massive original synthesis, plus the fact that the quoted section from the book merely mentions the jockstrap as an analogue for male genitalia and doesn't even talk about the phenomenon of smelling it. Therefore, while this slang term is widely used, the lack of reliable sources makes writing an encyclopedia article impossible at this time. -Nard 21:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Absolutely no references from non-trivial sources. If you can find even one single source i might support a single line mention in a more appropriate article on a greater topic. - Jimmi Hugh (talk) 23:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete pardon the pun, it looks like WP:BOLLOCKS to me. -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk to me The mess I've made 13:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This article is ridiculous, Jock Sniffing is certainly not worth an entry. --Hayden4258 (talk) 04:07, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.