Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jodi Grant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Jodi Grant

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

the alliance is notable, and the refs how it. She is not., for the refs merely indicate that she is exec director of the organization.; theydo not discuss her to a significant extent.  DGG ( talk ) 20:05, 16 April 2015 (UTC)


 * KEEP: Recently added sources illustrate the subject's notability independent of the Alliance (e.g. she was quoted extensively as an expert on the Family and Medial Leave Act in a book, was quoted as an expert on that subject in The New York Times, and helped successfully defend the law before the Supreme Court) and support her status as a thought leader in her field (was named one of the 25 most influential people in the field). She's received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources, and these recently added refs demonstrate that she's notable outside of the Alliance. (Per the discussion guidelines, disclosing that I've made significant contributions to the article) RachC (talk) 21:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Per . Needs cleanup and to be tighter, but meets notability guidelines. —Мандичка YO 😜 23:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep -The article doesn't present the topic in a promotional manner, its well structured and the person meets general notability guidelines S3venevan (talk) 04:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.