Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JoeAnt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  16:05, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

JoeAnt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I cannot find any evidence that this directory meets the general notability guideline. Aside from one directory review website, I found no reliable, independent sources that talk about the directory in depth. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  07:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  07:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: fails WP:GNG. The only references are useless for establishing notability or for independent verification.    Dr Strauss   talk   16:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Some brief mentions of the service in the context of Search engine optimization (SEO) in general (,, but these publications have too limited an audience and look more or less like blogs posts. Some brief mentions in books , but the independent coverage is not substantial enough for an article. I JethroBT drop me a line 07:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.