Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JoeQuake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Frag - crz crztalk 20:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

JoeQuake


Doesn't meet WP:SOFTWARE criteria. Memmke 10:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - no assertion of notability. MER-C 10:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per its non-assertion of notability, and lack of sources. Daveydw ee b ( chat/review! ) 11:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Daveydw ee b ( chat/review! ) 11:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Frag Absolutely no notability asserted whatsoever. -- Kicking222 21:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Okay, I've heard of it outside of Wikipedia. But aside of that, it's just a Quake source port, and while they would be worth discussing in an article of their own, I'm not really sure if JoeQuake is famous enough for an article of its own, even if it's in all likelihood on the verge of notability. If we had a Giant List of Quake Source Ports, this would be merge material. Very few source ports attain exceptional notability (I can only think of DarkPlaces, which is, as everyone knows, the Quake source port). --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 16:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Reads like a cross between spam and a vanity page. DarkSaber2k 15:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - vanity page about some one-man hack. Pete Fenelon 01:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.