Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Amabile


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NOQUORUM applies. ✗ plicit  12:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Joe Amabile

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another D-list celebrity with no substantial coverage beyond trivial Bachelorette snippets. PK650 (talk) 01:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: For evaluation of the newly added references. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PK650 (talk) 01:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. Google searching Amabile while excluding the names of his partners comes up with a few things. He has a dedicated article in Us Weekly and another in Cosmopolitan, along one or two other bits. . He is indeed a B-lister, but he seems to have the coverage to demonstrate notability. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 16:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Those two are web-only content that is wholly based off of Twitter comments. Hardly evidence of notability; quick gossip-type coverage these websites churn by the hour. PK650 (talk) 11:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing added supports inclusion on Wikipedia, non-notable subject in regards to here. The US Weekly piece is not in-depth in the way it would need to be for establishing WP:GNG. IrishOsita (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗ plicit  12:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.