Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Baugher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:22, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Joe Baugher

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

BLP based entirely on subject's personal page. A quick google search doesn't produce any coverage from other sources. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not supposed to be a lightly edited guide to the internet. We need more than sourcing to a subject's own website to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * This article dates back to 21 May, 2003. That is very early for a Wikipedia article to come from. It is amazing how long super substandard articles are able to survive.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. While the subject may have enjoyed a successful career, notability has not been shown. A search found no evidence of notability. It fails WP:GNG guidelines and does not pass WP:BIO. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 07:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.