Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Eigo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- Kjkolb 06:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Joe Eigo
Completing Afd by anon IP. Nominated by. No vote. Fan1967 16:52, 25 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable.
 * Delete - Not notable. - 81.179.95.130 17:07, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. His IMDB credits sound notable to me. TruthbringerToronto 18:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. He seems to have many enemies, based on the edits to the article and the votes here. That's probably a further argument in favour of his notability. TruthbringerToronto 22:41, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable, contains false info - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.184.220.253 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete - Not notable, horrible scam artist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.67.133.55 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. I see no evidence that the article contains false info or that he is a scam artist, but on the other hand I'm not convinced that he is notable merely for being a stuntman. --Metropolitan90 19:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Utterly nonnotable IMDB credits Bwithh 19:11, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think this is a hoax, but I also don't think the subject merits an article. GassyGuy 20:07, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. --Coredesat 21:09, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Very notable. This artist is extremely popular in certain communitys devoted for martial arts and tricking, as well as in 'video communitys' such as youtube, ebaum etc. Also created a worl-wide web-based community 'multilevelmoves' that is gaining popularity and is already well-known. Artist has notable IMDB credits too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.249.241.129 (talk • contribs)
 * Hi Joe. - 81.179.95.130 22:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * And although this is just my POV, it should probably be noted that Eigo is more commonly know for his hubris and comparative lack of ability in the tricking community more than anything. - 81.179.95.130 22:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. "Internet popularity on YouTube" just ins't going to cut it for me. tmopkisn tlka 23:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above, nn. &mdash; Khoikhoi 03:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with tmopkisn Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 22:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - HE does the same stuff over and over and is not worth an article on this thing. Also he loves the Noni, far too much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.25.215 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment - I am not convinced that this makes him notable so I will not vote. But just pointing out some things to consider:  He has independent bios here and here.  And his videos are quite widespread on free video sites.  He has also starred in a major movie with Jackie Chan and has an IMDB entry (also with an independent bio).  He has been mentioned on the cover of Jackie Chan's magazine.--Konstable 00:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * (It is also worth noting that I only found out about this page due to vandalism that I reverted here by one of the voting IP users, only to receive vandalism on my user page by the nominating IP user. So admins when counting votes you may want to disregard half of the above IPs as sockpuppets.)--Konstable 00:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Vandal != sockpuppet. Any vandalism is probably due to the fact that several people (myself included) were made aware of this article through a forum. - 85.210.176.196 02:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Eigo didn't star in a major movie with Jackie Chan. He was a stuntman in a major movie with Jackie Chan. There is a difference. --Metropolitan90 04:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete: Appears vanity and NN. Zos 03:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.