Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Hammerstone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 15:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Joe Hammerstone

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I had originally looked at this order with the intent to source and wikify it. As I dug down into it, however, I found that it is basically unsourcable. Despite 1100 ghits, an hour of reading failed to yield anything that suggests the requisite notability to pass WP:N and WP:ENTERTAINER. Despite the claim of having worked in "bigger budgeted" movies, everything in his filmography would be redlinked were it wikified. Trusilver 01:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:46, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I cleaned up the article a bit... wikifying and sourcing... but there is way too much POV and Peacock.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:20, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added a number of miscellaneous links and sites as references.  erkman27  erkman27 18:53, 26 November 2008 (CST)
 * I have read over each of these new links (at least one of which I would get rid of under WP:EL, but that's beside the point) and I don't see anything there that would help this individual pass WP:BIO or WP:ENTERTAINER. Trusilver  08:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.