Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Harris (politician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:49, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Joe Harris (politician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page fails the notability criteria. This individual is not a widely notable politician they are simply a low level municipal councillor in England. Wider press coverage and actual inherent notability in the individual has not been established. This page there needs deleting in-line with the notability policies of Wikiepdia as Wikiepdia is not a collection of every Tom, Dick and Harry elected to hold public office in England. Sport and politics (talk) 14:13, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete A local politician who lacks a notable office. He might later hold notable office, but does not yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2014 (UTC)


 * There's more coverage here than of many of the peers and baronets listed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage. Peter&#160;James (talk) 11:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * That is not really an valid argument to keep this page, it is more of an argument to improve or delete the other pages. Sport and politics (talk) 12:52, 16 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. Not sure about this one. Eighteen is very young to be elected to a council, which may be a reason to keep. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Still NN. We may hear more of him yet, but district councillor and town mayor (in a parish council) are not neough for notability.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:13, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is a long precedent that serving as a principal authority councillor in the UK is not sufficient for notability. Being elected at the age of 18 is also not particularly notable; since the minimum age was lowered, it has happened in quite a few authorities. Sam Blacketer (talk) 00:29, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.