Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Johnson (engineer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:06, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Joe Johnson (engineer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

An interesting bit of 'net history, I haven't, sadly, found reliable, secondary sources which provide in-depth coverage of this engineer and BBS operator. confirms a fact in the article but appears to be essentially information submitted by Johnson. Additional sources, as always, welcome. joe deckertalk to me 18:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - I can't find trustworthy websites which provide background and in depth coverage of the subject of this article, it seems that he plays a minor part in the WME and The Net, but not a notable role, if someone cannot provide a reason why this article should not be deleted, my !vote goes for it. Eduemoni↑talk↓  20:17, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — Red Baboon (talk) 21:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  — Red Baboon (talk) 21:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nothing found on which to base an article.--Michig (talk) 09:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced BLP. J04n(talk page) 15:40, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sources that pertain to this Joe Johnson. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 15:59, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.