Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe L. Reed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Biblio worm  17:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Joe L. Reed

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It seems he's mentioned considerably such as this, this, this, this and this but I'm not sure if he's fully notable and this can be better improved. Pinging the only still active users and. SwisterTwister  talk  07:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 11:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - the current article is pretty void of inline citations, and the hits I'm seeing on the internet seem to only deal with the one event regarding the Acadome. And the vast majority of those are simple passing mentions.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - I'd say borderline notability. He was notable for one event, after which there are passing mentions. Considering the state of the article, delete. — UY Scuti Talk  12:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.