Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Marciano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Joe Marciano

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable kickboxer. He fails to meet WP:KICK since he never fought for a major title and was never ranked in the top 10. Fighting and losing to some former and future champions is WP:NOTINHERITED. Of the article's 6 sources, none count towards GNG--4 are from IMDB, 1 doesn't even mention his name, and the other is a passing mention for fighting on the undercard of an upcoming fight card.Mdtemp (talk) 15:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete IMDB are in their own category and not particularly reliable. The two directly about Joe are essentially the same in a different format.  Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:KICK.  Fighting people on the way up or down does not make someone particularly noteworthy.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete There's no significant coverage to indicate he meets WP:GNG. There's also no evidence he meets any notability criteria for boxers (WP:NBOX) or kickboxers (WP:KICK). Papaursa (talk) 11:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * strong keep the article is strong in my opinion.CrazyAces489 (talk)
 * Please see WP:RS/IMDB.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 01:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC) ^Delete: Fails to meet GNG or MANOTE. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:25, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete As stated above, the individual does not meet the guidelines specified in WP:KICK and does not have enough WP:SIGCOV to be kept under our general notability guidelines. Mkdw talk 08:03, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.