Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Mohney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete, policy basis for deleting arguments substantially stronger than the keep ones. Daniel (talk) 00:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Joe Mohney

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Masses of refs but do any of them satisfy our requirements for independent reliable sources? &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 21 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete — Virtually zero coverage in reliable sources found in the article or online for that matter. Also the subject clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO.  STATic  message me!  19:57, 21 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - Interviews and magazine sources are available by large amounts, found much information regarding this artist online, found proof of all knowledge, artist does in fact have his Professional single in production. Article being deleted would be pointless since I found his single is scheduled for a release in January or early February 2014. Keep indeed. - Contributor, also edited the page to make it a bit more professional. Interesting individual. 19:10, 21 December 2013


 * Delete Although a few sources exist, there is no evidence of notability. There are some sources, but the sources do not seem to be independent of the subject of the article.  There is a strong sense that the article (and possibly some of the sources) were written by the subject or someone close to him.  The fact remains this article is about someone who released a mix tape last month. --TeaDrinker (talk) 00:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems that the sources may not all be terrific, but the few that are give a good picture of his success. Plus it is verifiable that this artist has a distribution deal with RED Distribution which can be found on many sites. He is definitely involved in the professional business, and I think this page would only be expanded upon in the very near future as he releases his single, which does meet our criteria for a relevant person. --11:40, 22 December 2013


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.