Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Ochoa (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   10:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Joe Ochoa
Nominating with neutral recommendation. This article was previously deleted (see Articles for deletion/Joe Ochoa, and then recreated. The subject seems on the border of notability, and something of a low-grade edit war has cropped up over Mr. Ochoa's claim to be a co-founder of the Intense Football League. User Veronicadittman vehemently contests that claim and has repeatedly removed it from the article. The claim is certainly poorly sourced and may well be false. It should be noted that Veronicadittman's username and comments also suggests a relation to Chad Dittman, who currently runs the league, so there may possibly be other motives involved as well. The article has been tagged and then WP:PRODded. I thought the deletion proposal should be discussed, so I deprodded it and listed it here. Since I'm involved in the edit conflict, I don't feel that I can give an unbiased opinion as to whether the article should or should not be deleted. Kickaha Ota 17:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC) Update: Okay, I know a consensus when I see one and I'm looking at one right now. Delete per, well, everybody. :) Kickaha Ota 21:48, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - As per WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and this subject isn't notable enough to be included in this encyclopedia. This looks like an attempt to gain publicity, nothing else. The information in this article is either unsourced, disputed/unreliable or non-notable. /M.O (u) (t) 17:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - Subject is not notable per WP:BIO. Nuff said. --Tom 17:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. If the article is created a third time, I suggest speedy deleting it as recreated content. -- Kjkolb 17:48, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Previously deleted, nothing stands out as notable, WP:WING, and, of course, Vancarlimospacecraft Avi 18:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per 3A3 ST47 18:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no WP:V from WP:RS indicating that subject meets WP:BIO. -- Kinu t /c  18:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not appear to meet WP:BIO. Deli nk 20:47, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No more notable than last time, though the article itself is better.  Fiddle Faddle 19:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.