Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Previtera


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Joe Previtera

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Classic case of WP:BLP1E. Everything notable is duplicated at Scott Muller (cricketer) anyway. Adpete (talk) 02:30, 7 January 2011 (UTC) Comment by nominator - I'm beginning to wonder whether to instead rename the article to Joe the cameraman. (i.e. delete the redirect at Joe the cameraman then rename Joe Previtera to Joe the cameraman). Yes it can all be put at Scott Muller (cricketer), but I wonder whether the incident (not the person Joe Previtera) is notable enough to have its own page, especially since it has (in a small way) passed into Australian vernacular. Adpete (talk) 02:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ONEEVENT -- Mattinbgn (talk) 20:40, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable under this name - BUT redirect the Joe the cameraman article to Scott Muller (cricketer) instead.The-Pope (talk) 00:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete delete per the above. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 16:28, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * First off, definitely agree the article should be titled Joe the cameraman. Leaning towards keep for the incident, as it has recieved lasting coverage and, as Adepte says above, it has "passed into the Australian vernacular". For example, see this search of The Age archives here. Jenks24 (talk) 05:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.