Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Schoenmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 05:04, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Joe Schoenmann

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Author of one non-notable book, (according to WorldCat, only 32 copies in libraries) Nothing else notable about his career--minor awards only  DGG ( talk ) 02:02, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep I disagree. He has worked in major roles for major newspapers and plenty of other appearances in major media. Passes GNG with multiple independent resources.  Royal broil  11:50, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 13:22, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — TheSpecialUser  ( TSU ) 14:39, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete. My understanding is that a journalist does not gain notability merely by the fact of his profession, so "worked in major roles for major newspapers", etc., to me is unconvincing.  (If that were the case, all journalists would automatically be notable.)  Ghosting a remarkably poorly-selling book for a minor true crime figure -- again, I'm not convinced.  The gold medal for a specific article from a national organization to me actually does contribute to notability, but summing it all up, it's just not enough for me to suggest retaining this article. Ubelowme U  Me  15:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete One non-notable book and routine work as a journalist isn't sufficient for WP:AUTHOR. There are some awards, but they are relatively minor. Overall he doesn't seem to meet the notability guidelines. CodeTheorist (talk) 07:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BASIC criteria. I've added a couple more independent resources. Plus, there are many Google scholar and book citations not included in the article. AuthorAuthor (talk) 13:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I'd say his awards probably make him meet WP:CREATIVE #1. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 22:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep His awards suggest to me that he passes WP:BASIC --Artene50 (talk) 07:59, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.