Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Seunghyun Cho


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that Joe does not reach the notability standards for an article in the encyclopedia. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Joe Seunghyun Cho

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person. Out of several sources sited on this page, some just mention Seunghyun in passing, and some do not even mention him. Google News search returns just 4 hits, none of which contains significant coverage.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Autobiography of non-notable head of a notable company. Someone should write an article about Marvelstone, but definitely not with him involved in the writing, it was speedied as spam. OnionRing (talk) 22:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:13, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:13, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:13, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete And yet another article on a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Speaking as a local, there has been literally no mention of the subject in Singaporean media. The best is this and this where the subject is mentioned (in passing) in the context of the company. This is not enough to pass GNG. Delete, as subject has no independent notability. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:02, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's sufficient consensus here, examining the article clearly showed no minimal signs of any basic notability. SwisterTwister   talk  18:23, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails to meet requirements of wp:gng. Search for significant coverage in reliable sources results in negative findings.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  22:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.