Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Tye


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Joe Tye

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional. Self-referential. Not notable Rathfelder (talk) 23:15, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete that a fluff article like this has had notices of its fluffness for over 7 years shows that Wikipedia needs to do something to start clearing these articles on non-notable people out.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article created by a WP:SPA and subsequently significantly edited by the WP:SPAs and . The article text is merely a CV (indeed, a WP:COPYVIO of this); it contains one possible claim to notability but lacks evidence. I am finding nothing to indicate that the subject is of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 08:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG with no substantial mention in independent, reliable sources. Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:52, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. As above, fluff piece with no independent RS. Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Right proper fluffery lacking any indication of WP:GNG. Blatant WP:PROMO by a WP:SPA with WP:LINKSPAM to top it off. - GS ⋙ ☎ 03:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.