Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Wehinger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I share Bearcat's concern about the nature of some of the opposition, but it does seem clear there is insufficient notability  DGG ( talk ) 04:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Joe Wehinger

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There seems to have been a bit of a vandal issue here, with at least two different usernames over the past two years replacing large chunks of the article with metacommentary about how "Wikipedia is not for self-promotion" — but despite using an improper process, the vandals do have a valid point about how the article comes across. It is a likely WP:COI violation, as the creator's username was User:JWWebsites, and it contains virtually no real reliable sources and makes no particularly strong claim of notability. Pretty clear delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:14, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 10:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

This page and biography are self-promotion. The article does not link to any sources. There is no information on this person that is not put forward by the subject - Joe Wehinger.

This person is not notable and does not deserve a Wikipedia page per Wikipedia policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.108.136.239 (talk • contribs) 02:06, 12 December 2013‎ (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

This person is not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.110.123.95 (talk) 18:40, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You'll kindly understand if we don't trust that an anonymous IP who has never edited Wikipedia before is actually a disinterested party with a reliable and trustworthy judgement of an article topic's notability or lack thereof. AFD is a consensus of established users, not a "vote" that anonymous users are allowed to stack. Bearcat (talk) 03:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails general notability guidelines. SarahStierch (talk) 01:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.