Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Wilson (director)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) SD0001 (talk) 09:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Joe Wilson (director)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reviwe of reputation AppoWeb (talk) 01:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AppoWeb (talk) 01:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. Nominator is a new account who has decided to launch straight into multiple AfDs. I regard the multiple nominations as vexatious. Mccapra (talk) 05:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * My friend, I did not have a specific purpose for tagging. I tagged the articles due to their shortness, and because I am a newcomer, I have a little trouble using Twinkle. Do not personally attack newcomers.Read Wp:newcomer better than once. 🆔 APO Discuss ✍ 05:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per Mccapra, WP:CSK #2–3, and the absence of any rationale for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. WP:SK1 appears to apply from the comment alone, and this and WP:SK3 is confirmed by 's followup. Length or the lack of it is not a valid reason for deletion, and even a one sentence stub article can be retained if the claim to notability is strong enough and its sourcing is sufficient (WP:ATA might be useful reading). No need for SK2 unless things continue -- WP:AGF and all. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 09:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.