Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Wren


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Joe Wren

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Apparent autobiography and unreferenced BLP by a "Reality Show producer" and "Internet celebrity" (read: young man with a YouTube channel). Prod contested by page creator Dogliker8. Non-notable per WP:GNG and WP:WEB. Cnilep (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  —Cnilep (talk) 17:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Cnilep (talk) 17:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - I can't  find anything  that  accords any  notability  to  any  Joe Wren. The page fails so many  policies and guidelines, esp. WP:BLP, WP:CITE and looks like a user's first  editing test. Possibly  good faith  and not  vandalism but it's really something  that  should be in  a sandbox,  and should probably  not  be left  in  article space in  its present  form.  To  judge by  the dob  & age in the bare tpl it  could be the work of a child. Suggest  the editor  work on  this some more in  his user space and find some reliable VRs before posting  to  article space.--Kudpung (talk) 18:05, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as an apparent test page. Best to advise new author on how to create and use a sandbox.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mr. C.C. (talk) 23:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't find any single slight hint at notability. noisy   jinx  huh? 02:40, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.