Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe zychik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. A lack of significant coverage in reliable sources means that the subject does not meet the inclusion guidelines for an article in the encyclopedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Joe zychik

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is full of weasel words ("well known", "He is famed") and reads like an advertisement, but a Google search makes him appear notable. Mm40 (talk) 11:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. "Joe Zychik" throws up ~1000 hits on google, but mostly free article mirrors and suchlike, I can't see any reliable sources. Three hits in google news archive but I wouldn't call it significant coverage.--Pontificalibus (talk) 11:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, why the heck wasn't this speedied? Ironholds (talk) 15:06, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't tag this for speedy deletion because I wasn't sure about the notability of the subject. I wanted feedback from some more-informed members. Mm40 (talk) 16:13, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Google news, book, and scholar searches are much more telling than a general Google search. There is a definite lack of in-depth coverage in reliable sources to establish notability.  Drawn Some (talk) 22:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete does not seem to be notable. As nom said, phrasing is suspect, and Google doesn't bear the truth of these claims. JuJube (talk) 09:02, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. He is mentioned in two news sources, one from 1989 and one from 2001, but that doesn't add up to notability. Fences and windows (talk) 00:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.