Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joeism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy deleted and salted. Doesn't qualify for G4 as it hasn't been through an AfD before, but certainly does qualify as G1 (nonsense).  E LIMINATOR JR  09:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Joeism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable references provided to show notability so very likely WP:MADEUP. Prod deleted by original author.  Neil N   talk  ♦  contribs  03:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is patent nonsense. Majoreditor 03:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: "...is a parody religion...". Evident NFT article. - Rjd0060 04:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT Wikipedia is not for things made up one day, indeed. — Save_Us _ 229  05:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, it meets criteria for speedy deletion as recreation of deleted content. The closing administrator should close and delete this when they see this page's log history. — Save_Us _ 229  05:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like it was previously speedied, so not speediable by CSD4 criteria. Doesn't mean it's not a load of Deleteable non-WP:RS-cited WP:NFT, just means we're going through the motions of the AfD process. DMacks 06:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: Deleted once before. Consists completely of made up nonsense. Andante1980 06:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete: Also, i think this article needs some salt Doc Strange 07:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.