Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Campbell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Joel Campbell

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable person,.references consist of 2 articles written by the article subject Wuh  Wuz  Dat  16:04, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree. This person isn't any more notable then any of the other BYU faculty members or  Salt Lake Tribune editors who aren't notable ether.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 16:58, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I also agree. This person cannot be considered notable. I personally would like to encourage this user to find more rigorous and reliable sources. Many of his articles appear to use poor sourcing or at the very least are borderline.Aquabanianskakid (talk) 19:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Weak Delete He wrote a regular weekly column for the Mormon Times for four years. Past editor and writer for the Deseret News. Currently, a columnist for the The Salt Lake Tribune. That being said, there are 3 current SL Tribune writers/columnists listed on Wikipedia, two have published multiple books and the third has alot of scholarly work published. I don't think Campbell rises to their level yet. Bgwhite (talk) 07:01, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 6 April 2011 (UTC)


 * NOTE This is only a post delete note.    After the articles deletion I noticed that this page has been deleted eight (8) times.  If recreated it would be helpful to be able to come here and to be able to refer to this note.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 12:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No, not really relevant: the previous deletions were more than five years ago, and were all nonsense articles about a different person. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.